Lack of examples or practical applicaitons

No effort on ennonciation from the teacher forcing us o use subtitles constantly

The entire course could fit ina 10 pages ebook

Very superficial. The instructor did not add any value - just some info quickly presented. Very disappointed; I was expecting much more from IE!

Fairly poor level of detail - you feel like you end up just learning terms without really getting a proper test on the understanding behind it.

I would the information provided in the course is a lot but it lacks the quality of explanation, they could have used some case studies

The explanation of topics were discussed in gist. It would be better if more explanation of the topics are given

Very poorly-structured course. I found that the content was very random and most concepts were hardly explained.

slides are not clear and materials are not very interesting, explain the concepts too fast and not deep enough.

The content is very limited, it needs more examples, more video examples and more reading content.

just covers a bunch of terms i did not need to know - would not recommend this course

Too much on theories. Need more real examples and implementation to make sense.

Lack of examples, sometimes it is not easy to understand what lesson is about

Незадовільно, так як не передбачено ідентифікацію через звичайний паспорт.

market research modules need to be completed, it has missing information.

Not much practical. It is more like a very theoretical class course

Content was dry and bland. Could have been more case-study heavy.

Really shallow and not very well structured/explained topics

There isn't any test and the lectures are very boring.

Less number of illustrations on Questionnair design

very generic. no what I was looking for.

cant understand the professor very well

it wasn't a good learning experience.

Too much theory

best

,

The production quality of the videos is terrible - typos (Sample is spelled Simple many times, the first time I was really confused what was meant since it was introducing a new 2 word term until I realized it was a typo), jarring jumps, some audio recorded in a busy street with lots of background noise, inconsistent slides (including one module where they suddenly used every animation from power point. Fortunately that only lasts one video), in video quizzes with no answers just a question, those in video quizzes often start in the middle of a word, etc. There is obviously content missing (he will say "in our next video we will cover X", but it doesn't get covered in the next video, his summary will say "we learned X" when it wasn't covered, and there is at least one question on a quiz that isn't covered anywhere in the course - I got it right because it's fairly obvious, but I went back and searched the transcript of the video - it wasn't covered) The material presentation itself is not very informative. For example, he provides a definition for Ordinal Data - data that can be put into some sort of meaningful order but that order does not have any significance. That's it. no further explanation. I'm not even sure what a "meaningful insignificant order" would be. No "and here is why you use it".... I made notes of all the terms he used and then just googled them to get a better explanation before I took the quizzes because I knew I didn't understand from the videos. I got a 100% on the course and I don't think I left with any better understanding than I started, but with a lot of memorized definitions that don't really make much sense that I could have just googled better explanations for in real life.