Great content. With real exams

very informative

great course

typos.

good

nice

Lots of typos and grammatical errors. I made a lot of mistakes until I read along with the videos. Needs someone to go through and do a good proofreading. Other than that, it seemed like there were good points to be made and learned. Occasionally, there were areas that seemed confusing - I would've liked more examples of the different analysis methods.

Enjoyed the course. Good information and moderate pace. There are some typos in the curriculum and one or two glitches in the questions also.

The course is so mechanic, even the voices are digital and the shouting instructor follows the slides only.

We need to have a source for revesion or if the slides where available to revise from it.

Mechanical presentation and reading of slides. A bit dry.

Correct but not very impressive course.

Content is right and complete, but delivery is uneven: some modules (eg 3 and onwards) are basically reading out loud a series of often not connected phrases, without a proper flow.

Not the best course from this University. I hope the rest of the specialization is of a higher standard.

The final test is *heinously* bad. The content is confusing/ambiguous, and the quiz looks like it was written as an afterthought by some random person contracted to formulate answers. This was a terrible experience for the first unit of a rather-significant certification.

The material is not so engaging, i would prefer to see an instructor talking about the theme. Also, the questions during the course sometimes are unbiguous. I thing it should be more interactive as wel..

Fairly general, brief, and generic introduction to strategy and organization. Briefly discusses lean 6 sigma.

The lecturer feels to be reading (badly) from a powerpoint. It is very distracting

The grading system is flawed. The peer reviews by novices are mandatory instead of optional. Grade and completion is dependant upon novices grading assignments. The forced social interaction is a business move to monetize the social networking within the platform. How can a novice student be allowed to pass or fail a project when they are not qualified to teach it. There is no educational value when graded by unqualified persons with zero experience. This should be eliminated. This is cause for invalidating our achievements with employers due to this lazy grading system. Educators are passing their duties unto the student to avoid the work they are supposed to perform. No oversight in these 'Peer Reviewed" assignments. I will only participate in Peer review assignments if they have Zero impact on our grades. This is not a legitimately approved grading system.

I am an Industrial Engineer with knowledge and experience in six sigma This course lacks explanation, it is an AI reading a text with no proper clarification. The later courses will even get more worse and boring. It is also so weird that we have reached 2025 and yet there is no slides and even the content is not written on the slides on video, so you can't take screenshot's nor download slides