A technical writing course should include writing assignments... but aside from that, the information in the course is redundant and repetitive, and the external sources provided don't always link to an actual article to read. Additionally, sources that do have direct links are often to blog posts or other unverified sources. I will not be taking another Coursera course, and wish I could get my money back for this.

Occasionally informative, though basic concepts were often over-emphasized and repeated, despite more important information missing context. I also wish they provided technical writing exercises and prompts to help us actually apply the information taught.

This seems to be the exact same class as "Writing Effective Technical Documentation". Please remove the redundancy.

unclear voice, only english subtitle included, I lost interest after first video

All in all, you could just browse blog posts for an hour and get more than you will out of this course. * Horrible audio -- poorly recorded, bad levels, regular honking of car horns in the background. * Significant portions are just links to third-party sites for you to read -- and not all the links work. * Low-effort scraping together of a very broad overview from the Internet. Zero evidence of the "instructor" actually having insight or experience in the industry. * Time-wasting with non-sequitur statements like "Word processors and tools are not just software" to pad runtime.

Instructor isn't a technical writer. Content is vague and could apply to almost any kind of writing. Zero specific insights into technical writing. Zero hard examples of technical writing. Probably the whole thing was written by ChatGPT.

It's too general, and with no examples on how to write. Some of the information are repetitive and the history section is not that important when I want to look for a job.